· 1/25/1974
National Treasury Employees Union v. Richard M. Nixon, Individually and as President of the United States
Citations
- 492 F.2d 587
- 160 U.S. App. D.C. 321
- 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10397
- 21 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 511
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “no immunity established under any case known to this Court bars every suit against the President for injunctive, declaratory or mandamus relief”
- finding that the case “presents a most appropriate instance for the use of a declaratory decree”
- recognizing authority to issue mandamus but finding it “most appropriate” to “opt instead” to issue declaratory relief
- declaring “constitutional duty” of President to issue pay increase to certain public employees pursuant to legislation
- considering declaratory judgment to be a less drastic remedy than a writ of mandamus
- considering declaratory judgment to be a less drastic remedy than a writ of mandamus
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaufman, Robinson, Wilkey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.