National Trade Productions v. Information Development Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding reversible error where the Superior Court “substitute[d] an alternate date from the date 61 provided in the contract for the payment of . . . $250,000” in purporting to find “the parties’ agreement was unambiguous on its face”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).