National Telephone Cooperative Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the agency’s RFA analysis complied with the requirements of the Act, because the analysis at issue “undoubtedly addressed all of the legally mandated subject areas”
• acknowledging the narrowness of review when a case involves agency “predictive judgments about the likely economic effects of a rule”
• agency could permissibly postpone consideration of certain costs that would be associated with a separate rulemaking
• “The APA’s arbitrary- and-capricious standard requires that agency rules be reasonable and reasonably explained.”
• “The APA’s arbitrary-and-capricious standard requires that agency rules be reasonable and reasonably explained.”
• “The APA’s arbitrary-and-capricious standard requires that agency rules be reasonable and reasonably explained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).