National Taxpayers Union v. United States Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider new evidence of deliber- ate indifference under § 1983 when plaintiff did not raise the issue before the district court
• refusing to consider new evidence of deliber- ate indifference under § 1983 when plaintiff did not raise the issue before the district court
• affirming summary judgment for defendant where she had no authority to act on a complaint, therefore not creating an issue of fact with respect to personal involvement
• applying John Doe rule and affirming denial of motion to amend
• \The untimely amendment would not 'relate back' to the date of his original complaint because Flournoy made no mistake; he simply lacked knowledge of the proper defendants.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).