· 7/30/2007
National Surety Corp. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
Citations
- 493 F.3d 752
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18049
- 2007 WL 2162677
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reciting 9 No. 24-1436, Gardner v. Flagstar Bank, FSB how we “resolv[e] an issue of state law in a diversity case” by “mak[ing] [the] best prediction . . . of what the [state high court] would do” (third alteration in original) (quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “Absent a rule permitting excess insurers to recover against primary insurers, primary insurers could, in bad faith, fail to accept settlement offers at or near policy limits with impunity.”
- a Kentucky case in which the doctrine of equitable subrogation was at issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ryan, Daughtrey, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.