National Surety Co. v. Taylor's Guardian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that deciding a Parity Act claim is a matter of interpreting a statute, which is a legal question afforded no deference
• finding Parity Act enforceable through a cause of action under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3)
• remanding to the plan administrator “to evaluate in the first instance whether it owes the F. Family benefits . . . based on the Administrator’s interpretation of the Plus Plan’s terms.”
• “The court concludes that the Plus Plan’s residential treatment exclusion violates the Parity Act because the exclusion is a separate treatment limitation that is applicable only with respect to mental health benefits.”
• identifying New Haven as “a licensed residential treatment facility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).