National Surety Co. v. Lyons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that United's weight requirement did not violate ADEA
• indicating that Congress' subsequent amendments to Title VII and to the ADEA signal its intent not to provide for a disparate impact cause of action under the ADEA
• holding that the ADEA does not permit disparate impact claims
• noting in dicta that the plaintiffs’ failure to meet weight limit requirement for new flight attendants was fatal to their prima facie case
• affirming denial of motion for expert fees filed nine and a half months after entry of final judgment
• affirming denial, on timeliness grounds, of request to shift fees charged by “expert witness for preparation, review, and travel” related to expert deposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).