National Shopmen Pension Fund v. Burtman Iron Works, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• enjoining defendants “from failing to submit required contributions and remittance reports in accordance with the [CBA]” because “defendants have consistently been delinquent in remitting contributions and remittance reports”
• “Generally, interpretation of a facially clear contract is considered a question of law and is for the court.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).