National Refrigeration, Inc. v. Standen Contracting Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a choice-of-law analysis is not necessary where the parties fail “to articulate any disparity between the law” of the jurisdictions
• \Whether the terms of a contract are clear and unambiguous is itself a question of law * * *.\
• \A motion justice need not engage in a choice-of-law analysis when no conflict-of-law issue is presented to the court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).