· 2/8/1984
National Recruiters, Inc. v. Toro Co.
Citations
- 343 N.W.2d 704
- 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3008
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in applying the doctrine of frustration of purpose, the court considered testimony from a company manager explaining the company’s purpose in hiring the individual was frustrated by elimination of the position
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Popovich, Foley, Sedgwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.