Skip to main content
· 6/6/2003

National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Expresstrak, L.L.C.

Citations

  • 330 F.3d 523
  • 356 U.S. App. D.C. 259
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11319
  • 2003 WL 21293585

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that pendent jurisdiction is not exercised “liberally,” but will be invoked “in two circum- stances: (1
  • applying the law of the District of Columbia where “[t]he parties’ agreements provide that they are to be interpreted under District of Columbia law”
  • applying law of contract to determine whether the parties must arbitrate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Rogers, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.