· 6/6/2003
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Expresstrak, L.L.C.
Citations
- 330 F.3d 523
- 356 U.S. App. D.C. 259
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11319
- 2003 WL 21293585
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that pendent jurisdiction is not exercised “liberally,” but will be invoked “in two circum- stances: (1
- applying the law of the District of Columbia where “[t]he parties’ agreements provide that they are to be interpreted under District of Columbia law”
- applying law of contract to determine whether the parties must arbitrate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Rogers, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.