National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. McDavitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If the language [of the jury instruction at issue] arguably might have been more precise, the deviation from perfection was not material.”
• question of applicable standard of care was “a subject amenable to common sense, to which the lay jurors ... could apply their own experience in deciding how any reasonably prudent person would have acted under the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).