National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. 10,178 Square Feet of Land More or Less

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that courts should be wary of granting a motion to dismiss on this ground because “whether intermittent or sporadic violations are ongoing or wholly past requires evidence,” which is more appropriately addressed on summary judgment
• “A discharge of pollutants into navigable waters occurring only through migration of groundwater and uncontrolled soil runoff represents ‘nonpoint source’ pollution.” (emphasis added)
• “Although Plaintiffs have not stated any claims against [the city], any decision in this case will affect its interest in the Site as property owner and thus it is properly joined as an indispensable party under Rule 19.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).