National Pyrites & Copper Co. v. Wilbur

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing aesthetics as “significant government interest ]” when upholding ordinance regulating newsracks in traditional public forum
• recognizing aesthetics as \significant government interest[ ]\ when upholding ordinance regulating newsracks in traditional public forum
• rejecting disparate treatment argument where there was no evidence regulation was enacted because of a dislike with the message conveyed
• finding city took several steps to enhance its1 aesthetic interest by convening a task force, conducting research, and revising ordinance
• finding city took several steps to enhance its aesthetic interest by convening a task force, conducting research, and revising ordinance
• rejecting disparate treatment argument where there was no evidence regulation was enacted because of a dislike with the message conveyed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).