NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASS'N v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying agency’s motion to vacate a rule and dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction following settlement with plaintiffs but not intervenors
• denying agency’s motion to vacate a rule and dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction following settlement with plaintiffs but not intervenors
• denying agency’s motion to vacate a rule and dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction following settlement with plaintiffs but not intervenors
• denying a motion to vacate an agency rule and remand where it would “wrongfully permit the Federal defendants to bypass established statutory procedures for repealing an agency rule”
• denying the Secretary’s request to vacate and remand an amendment to stream buffer zones regulations, which the government alleged was legally deficient, because it would allow an end run around APA procedures
• “[N]otice and comment procedure is not required where a court vacates a rule after making a finding on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).