National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc., and Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that regulations interpreting \entitled to receive\ language of 38 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a)(2) and 1318 were inconsistent and the Agency failed in its obligation to reconcile regulations under the two statutory provisions
• “It is, of course, impermissible for the Department to adopt regulations ... on the ground that particular regulations are required under the unambiguous language of the statutes.” (emphasis added)
• “It is, of course, impermissible for the Department to adopt regula- tions . . . on the ground that particular regulations are required under the unambiguous language of the stat- utes.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).