National Mutual Insurance v. Dotschay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims not raised in a PCRA petition are “waived and not cognizable on appeal”
• holding that claims not raised in PCRA petition are “waived and not cognizable on appeal”
• holding that claims not raised in PCRA petition are “waived and not cognizable on appeal”
• holding that claims not raised in a PCRA petition are “waived and not cognizable on appeal”
• holding that where a “jury could have reasonably inferred from the photographic evidence presented at trial that a defendant was involved in prior criminal activity, reversible error occurred”
• holding that previously litigated claim is not cognizable under the PCRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).