National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Viet Nam v. Thomas A. Foran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the teaching of the use, application, and making of incendiary devices was not protected by the First Amendment where speakers “know, or have reason to know, or intend[]” for the knowledge to be used unlawfully
• “It is true that section 231(a)(3) does not specifically refer to intent, but it only applies to a person who ‘commits or attempts to commit any act to obstruct, impede, or interfere’ with firemen or law enforcement officers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).