National Mining Ass'n v. Department of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a rule is impermissibly retroactive if \applied to claims that were pending on the regulations' effective date\
• concluding that such a pre-enforcement “broad-scale attack” on an agency rule falls outside the relevant statutory-review scheme
• concluding that such a pre-enforcement “broad-scale attack” on an agency rule falls outside the relevant statutory-review scheme
• noting that the distinction between clinical and legal pneumoconiosis is recognized by all the circuits that considered the issue
• noting that where a “rule changes the legal landscape in a way that affects substantive liability determinations . . . it may operate retroactively”
• stating that applying substantively different rules to “pending claims” is impermissibly retroactive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).