National Mah Jongg League, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that permitting “ commercial indifference to ownership or the right to sell ... facilitates traffic in stolen works of art’ ”
• striking those portions of expert’s testimony beyond the scope of his expertise, and admitting others within scope
• striking those portions of expert’s testimony beyond the scope of his expertise, and admitting others within the scope
• excluding expert's opinions of value in deciding a motion for summary judgment because expert \did not apply any established methodology\ pursuant to, among other standards, USPAP.
• finding a red flag where the paintings were listed \as owned by SOG in the exchange paperwork-even though the provenance and cataloguing materials unmistakably identified Davis or the Davis estate as the owner\
• admonishing that “[a]t no point in [expert’s] report, deposition, or declaration does [expert] clarify the full set of factors that play a role in this analysis, nor does [expert] explain how these factors interact or how much weight each factor is assigned in his calculus”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).