National Labor Relations Board v. Weirton Steel Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that alternative forum was available because all defendants had indicated that they would be amenable to service of process in New Zealand
• holding that alternative forum was available because all defendants had indicated that they would be amenable to service of process in New Zealand
• holding that, “[b]ecause the local interest in this lawsuit is comparatively low, the citizens of Arizona should not be forced to bear the burden of this dispute”
• holding that the foreign location of documentary evidence weighed in favor of dismissal where it was not in plaintiff’s control or under the control of a foreign government
• holding that New Zealand had “extremely high” local interest where a “crash involved a New Zealand airline carrying New Zealand passengers” and where local media had covered the accident, its investigation, and following proceedings
• noting that it is only in “rare circumstances ... that this requirement is not met” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).