National Labor Relations Board v. Town & Country Electric, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that courts interpreting a term within a statute “must infer, unless the statute otherwise dictates, that Congress means to incorporate the established meaning of that term” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that “the Board needs very little legal leeway here to convince us of the correctness of its decision” extending the term “employee” in the NLRA to include prospective employees who were also union organizers
• giving deference to NLRB’s interpretation of National Labor Relations Act
• discussing broad construction of the term “employee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).