National Labor Relations Board v. Tomco Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the manner in which disputes are settled during the term of a collective bargaining agreement is generally a mandatory subject of bargaining
• distinguishing “offers” from concessions; “Absent abuse not present here, it is perfectly legitimate for a party to retract a proposal before the other side has accepted it.”
• taking into consideration, in determining substantiality of evidence, that the Board diverged from the AU’s findings on matters of credibility
• \An employer may insist on a management rights clause to impasse without violating the [National Labor Relations] Act.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).