Skip to main content
· 12/7/1983

National Labor Relations Board v. Rochester Institute of Technology

Citations

  • 724 F.2d 9
  • 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2208
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding finding of no substantial similarity between two products where their particularized expression of the same unprotectable idea—a “superhuman muscleman” crouching in a traditional fighting pose—differed based on the manner in which they “overemphasiz[ed] certain muscle groups”
  • “The rendering of [an unprotectable idea] is not in itself protectable; only the particularized expression of that idea . . . can be protected.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, Meskill, Bonsal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.