· 1/7/1963
National Labor Relations Board v. Reliance Fuel Oil Corp.
Citations
- 371 U.S. 224
- 83 S. Ct. 312
- 9 L. Ed. 2d 279
- 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2517
- 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2046
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Congress intended to and did vest in the Board the fullest jurisdictional breadth constitutionally permissible under the Commerce Clause.\
- “the immediate situation is representative of many others throughout the country, the total incidence of which if left unchecked may well become far-reaching in its harm to commerce”
- “Congress intended to and did vest in the Board the fullest jurisdictional breadth constitutionally permissible under the Commerce Clause.”
- “This Court has consistently declared that in passing the [NLRA], Congress intended to and did vest in the Board the fullest jurisdictional breadth constitutionally permissible under the Commerce Clause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.