Skip to main content
· 1/7/1963

National Labor Relations Board v. Reliance Fuel Oil Corp.

Citations

  • 371 U.S. 224
  • 83 S. Ct. 312
  • 9 L. Ed. 2d 279
  • 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2517
  • 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2046

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Congress intended to and did vest in the Board the fullest jurisdictional breadth constitutionally permissible under the Commerce Clause.\
  • “the immediate situation is representative of many others throughout the country, the total incidence of which if left unchecked may well become far-reaching in its harm to commerce”
  • “Congress intended to and did vest in the Board the fullest jurisdictional breadth constitutionally permissible under the Commerce Clause.”
  • “This Court has consistently declared that in passing the [NLRA], Congress intended to and did vest in the Board the fullest jurisdictional breadth constitutionally permissible under the Commerce Clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.