Skip to main content
· 4/27/1984

National Labor Relations Board v. Rain-Ware, Inc.

Citations

  • 732 F.2d 1349
  • 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2261
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[t]he timing of the layoffs and warehouse closing provides the strongest support for connecting anti-union sentiment with the layoffs,” where the layoffs and warehouse closing closely followed a demand for union recognition
  • concluding that “[t]he timing of the layoffs and warehouse closing provides the strongest support for connecting anti-union sentiment with the layoffs,” where the layoffs and warehouse closing closely followed a demand for union recognition
  • holding, in context of employee discharge, that “[t]iming alone may suggest ant-union animus as a motivating factor in an employer’s action”
  • timing of layoffs can support inference that anti-union animus motivated the layoffs
  • \[t]he presentation of implausible or shifting explanations for the alleged violation is a factor suggesting discrimination against union activity\
  • “[t]he presentation of implausible or shifting explanations for the alleged violation is a factor suggesting discrimination against union activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Wood, Posner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.