National Labor Relations Board v. Pentre Electric, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \employees may not reasonably conclude that they are being coerced where the opinions refer to matters over which the speaker has no control\
• observing that “employees may not reasonably conclude that they are being coerced where the opinions refer to matters over which the speaker has no control”
• explaining that a “statement is an unlawful threat” if it “is subjectively phrased in that it conveys that the employer will act on its own initiative to punish its employees as the result of anti-union animus”
• “Of course, the basis for an employer’s statements must be truthful for the statement to receive the protection of section 8(c).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).