Skip to main content
· 12/18/1961

National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp.

Citations

  • 368 U.S. 318
  • 82 S. Ct. 344
  • 7 L. Ed. 2d 312
  • 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1930
  • 49 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failure or neglect of party to raise objection during administrative proceedings forecloses judicial consideration of the objection in enforcement proceedings, absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances
  • objection to Board decision in its entirety as “contrary to constitutional principles of due process” was “too broad to call attention to the narrow point raised ... or to suggest that this was [the] point”
  • \[I]n the absence of a showing within the statutory exception of 'extraordinary circumstances' the failure or neglect of the respondent to urge an objection in the Board's proceedings forecloses judicial consideration of the objection in enforcement proceedings.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brennan, Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.