National Labor Relations Board v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Company Local 1022, Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court properly accepted undisputed evidence of a bank’s routine practice when ruling on a summary judgment motion
• “Our review of the Board’s construction of the National Labor Relations Act is guided by Chevron . . . .”
• “[S]hould [I] have a union representative present[?]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).