National Labor Relations Board v. Marsh Supermarkets, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statements were threats of economic reprisal because “the Board could have reasonably inferred that the ‘listener-employees’ took the statements as threats of loss of benefits and of economic reprisal”
• statements were threats of economic reprisal because 'the Board could have reasonably inferred that the 'listener-employees' took the statements as threats of loss of benefits and of economic reprisal'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).