National Labor Relations Board v. Kane, Dunham & Kraus, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that once the threshold findings are made, the Court must weigh “the materiality and intent in light of all the circumstances to determine whether the applicant’s conduct is so culpable that the patent should be held unenforceable”
• “Because the district court afforded [the plaintiff] the benefit of the presumption, the burden properly was on [the defendant] to produce evidence sufficient to establish that [the plaintiff] would not be irreparably harmed[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).