· 1/6/1984
National Labor Relations Board v. Homemaker Shops, Inc.
Citations
- 724 F.2d 535
- 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2321
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing these factors as relevant to analysis of Board's power to amend a complaint
- scheduling of union meetings, assistance with union elections, reimbursement for work time lost and travel expenses incurred due to union activities and provision of coffee and company space for meetings not violative of NLRA
- scheduling of union meetings, assistance with union elections, reimbursement for work time lost and travel expenses incurred due to union activities and provision of coffee and company space for meetings not violative of NLRA
- in absence of similar factors, Board incorrectly found questioning to be coercive
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy, Wellford, Weick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.