National Labor Relations Board v. Herbert Halperin Distributing Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employer seeking to set aside an election bears the “heavy burden” of showing that infractions “materially affected the election results”
• upholding Board's determination that employ- ees were not agents of the union where the union's profes- sional staff was heavily involved in the campaign and where union did not rely primarily on employees to organize the other workers
• \[W]e think that it is unrealistic to expect every election dialogue to be completely sanitized.\
• question is whether the \amount of association between the union and the [employees] is signifi- cant enough to justify charging the union with the conduct\
• \[t]he final inquiry is always whether the amount of association between the union and the [employees] is significant enough to justify charging the union with the conduct\
• \The Act . . . encourages a free-wheeling debate during the election process. Not [everyone] who supports the union or speaks in its favor is a Union agent\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).