National Labor Relations Board v. Hawaiian Flour Mill, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a supervisor’s “[tjalking to employees about the union, expressing personal views about the union, and answering questions about the union are permissible expressions of opinion when made in non-coercive and nonthreatening circumstances”
• in finding pro-union activity to be non-coercive, the court noted that only one supervisor was engaged in pro-union activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).