National Labor Relations Board v. Gordon (In Re Gordon)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in a § 523(a)(6) action, “[a] court will rarely, if ever, have before it direct evidence of an individual’s intent. Consequently, it is not only permissible, but necessary, to divine intent from indirect evidence.”
• D.C. Commission finding of discrimination not given collateral estoppel effect where no factual finding of malice required
• it is “absolutely permissible to infer ... actual intent to cause injury from ... evidentiary facts”
• in a § 523(a)(6) action, a court may divine a debtor’s intent from indirect evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).