National Labor Relations Board v. Gary Frazier, an Individual

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that an order to quash a subpoena in that ease was dispositive because “it determine[d] with finality the duties of the parties”
• holding that the District Court should apply de novo review to a dispositive motion
• explaining that a magistrate judge may not resolve dispositive matters unless all parties to the litigation consent
• explaining that a magistrate judge may not resolve dispositive matters unless all parties to the litigation consent
• explaining that a magistrate judge may not resolve dispositive matters unless all parties to the litigation consent
• noting that under 28 U.S.C. § 636, “a district judge may reconsider a magistrate judge’s decision where it has been shown to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).