National Labor Relations Board v. Frigid Storage, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that retaliatory change in working conditions violates § 8(a)(1) and (3)
• stating the same and noting that \there is an important distinction between an ALJ's findings as to credibility of witnesses and those drawing inferences or applying applicable law.\
• upholding anti-union animus based on “the bare timing of [the employee’s] discharge”
• upholding anti-union animus based on “the bare timing of [the employee’s] discharge”
• anti-union motive shown by timing of discharge, dubious explanation offered by employer, and employer's prior anti-union statements
• anti-union motive shown by timing of discharge, dubious explanation offered by employer, and employer's prior anti-union statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).