National Labor Relations Board v. Food Store Employees Union, Local 347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the Fourth Circuit has not specified the standard of proof to apply when evaluating the elements of Rule 23, but applies the “preponderance standard” based on persuasive authority
• explaining “a court reviewing an agency decision following an intervening change of policy by the agency should remand”
• requiring plaintiff to finance the cost of Rule 23(c)(2) class notice
• “a court reviewing an agency decision following an intervening change of policy by the agency should remand to permit the agency to decide in the first instance whether giving the change retrospective effect will best effectuate the policies underlying the agency’s governing act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).