National Labor Relations Board v. FedEx Freight, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because there was no ongoing ‘proceeding’ other than the motion to intervene, the United States effectively removed only the motion to intervene, not the prior action, no matter how the notice of removal was phrased.”
• “Because there was no ongoing ‘proceeding’ other than the motion to intervene, the United States effectively removed only the motion to intervene, not the prior action, no matter how the notice of removal was phrased.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).