National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding Board invalidation of union electoral loss where employer granted unlawful economic benefits during campaign
• noting effectiveness of a \fist inside the velvet glove\: \[e]mployees are not likely to miss the inference that the source of benefits now conferred is also the source from which future benefits must flow and which may dry up if it is not obliged\
• noting effectiveness of a “fist inside the velvet glove”: “[e]mployees are not likely to miss the inference that the source of benefits now conferred is also the source from which future benefits must flow and which may dry up if it is not obliged”
• increase in benefits, if undertaken to discourage support for union, unlawful under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
• employer's provision of benefit to employees made with \express purpose\ of discouraging unionization violates § 8(a)(1)
• increase in benefits, if undertaken to discourage support for union, unlawful under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).