National Labor Relations Board v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a supervisor’s act of questioning an employee as to why he supported the union, as well as the supervisor’s statement to the employee that he had supervisor potential if he did not support the union, rose to the level of coercive conduct
• finding that a supervisor's act of questioning an employee as to why he supported the union, as well as the supervisor's statement to the employee that he had supervisor potential if he did not support the union, rose to the level of coercive conduct
• considering an employer’s disparate treatment of an employee compared to its treatment of other employees as a relevant factor in finding that substantial evidence supported the NLRB’s finding that the employer discharged the employee in retaliation for his union activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).