National Labor Relations Board v. E. Bruce Harvey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court was required to conduct “a full evidentiary hearing” before enforcing a Board subpoena challenged on privilege grounds
• client’s identity will be protected when so much of the substance of the communication is already in the government’s possession that additional disclosures would yield substantially probative links in an existing chain of inculpatory events or transactions
• “Here, upon identification of the client, it will be known that the client wanted information about Shrader. More than the identity of the client will be disclosed by naming the client.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).