National Labor Relations Board v. Columbia University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “direct evidence of employer knowledge of union or concerted activity is not a prerequisite to a finding that such knowledge existed.”
• “the protection afforded to concerted activities under the NLRA applies equally to workers in unionized or in non-unionized firms”
• credibility choice to be overturned when \on its face it is hopelessly incredible\
• credibility choice to be overturned when “on its face it is hopelessly incredible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).