National Labor Relations Board v. Cochrane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that all time from the commencement of the collateral attack is excluded under § 2244(d)(2)
• concluding that it was not an 3 abuse of discretion for the district court to retain jurisdiction when the proceedings had reached 4 the summary judgment stage and “the district court was fully familiar with the record”
• noting that the court in a state-created danger case “must determine whether [the state] did in fact affirmatively place [the plaintiff] in danger”
• noting that the court in a state-created danger case “must determine whether [the state] did in fact affirmatively place [the plain- tiff] in danger”
• noting that the court in a state-created danger case “must determine whether [the state] did in fact affirmatively place [the plaintiff] in danger”
• noting that the court in a state-created danger case “must determine whether [the state] did in fact affirmatively place [the plaintiff] in danger”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).