National Labor Relations Board v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court’s failure to make the necessary findings related to a restitution order constitutes plain error
• holding that although the defendant “was incarcerated when those offenses occurred, he remained a coconspirator—he soon emerged from jail to resume participation in the ring’s drug-trafficking—and was responsible for crimes that were foreseeable consequences of the conspiracy”
• stating defendant in criminal conspiracy may be “liable as a conspirator for the[] reasonably foreseeable crimes of his coconspirators”
• rejecting fair cross-section claim where appellant “made absolutely no showing that African Americans were systematically excluded” from the venire
• finding manifest necessity where trial judge gave Allen charge and polled jury before discharging it
• denying Sixth 9 1 Amendment cross-section claim because defendant “made 2 absolutely no showing that African Americans were 3 systematically excluded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).