National Labor Relations Board v. Calumet Steel Division of Borg-Warner Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the interpretation of a provision of the Embargo Regulations \given by the agency charged with enforcing the embargo is normally controlling\
• stating that Congress’s purpose in Section 201 was “not to permit assignment of confiscated trademarks without the consent of the original owner”
• declining to accord broad construction to term “related to” as used in statutory exception to prohibition because doing so would swallow much of prohibition
• affirming the district court’s finding that HCI had no standing to bring suit where HCI did not sell its “Havana Club” rum in the United States market
• addressing argument that commercial injury was based on lost sales in Cuba but up- holding finding that evidence did not demonstrate the like- lihood of such lost sales
• Under the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, blocked assets cannot be transferred without authorization from OFAC.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).