Skip to main content
· 5/7/2004

National Labor Relations Board v. Cable Car Advertisers, Inc.

Citations

  • 319 F. Supp. 2d 991
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • awarding costs under Rule 81(a)[(5)] despite no provision for costs under the applicable statute
  • “However, as stated by the Board, by filing a cross-application to enforce the subpoenas in district court, the Board has waived its objection to Cable Car’s improperly filed motion”
  • requiring production subject to a 6 protective order
  • requiring production subject to a protective order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Chen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.