National Labor Relations Board v. Butts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[pjecuniary loss is a very real factor to be considered in determining whether prejudice to the defendant exists”
• noting that the length of the delay reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. Churma v.United States Steel Corp., 514 F.2d 589, 593 (3d Cir. 1975
• defendant’s payment of employee wages to another to do plaintiff’s work for more than nine years is a “very real factor” in determining whether prejudice exists
• statute of limitations applies to legal claims, laches applies to equitable claims
• applying 1713 Act to veteran’s seniority status claim
• “If a plaintiff sleeps on his rights for a period of time greater than the applicable statute of limitations, then ‘the plaintiff (must) . . . come forward and prove that his delay was excusable and that it did not . . . prejudice the defendant.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).