Skip to main content
· 12/7/1989

National Labor Relations Board v. Buckley Broadcasting Corporation of California, Dba Station Kkhi

Citations

  • 891 F.2d 230
  • 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2175
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • giving dispositive weight to the third factor, noting, “Buck- ley’s argument fails under the third factor. There is no possi- bility of an inequitable result from retroactive application of the Board’s new standard because the new standard works to Buckley’s advantage.”
  • giving dispositive weight to the third factor, noting, “Buck- ley’s argument fails under the third factor. There is no possi- bility of an inequitable result from retroactive application of the Board’s new standard because the new standard works to Buckley’s advantage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers, Brunetti, Noonan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.