National Labor Relations Board v. Buckingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the relevance of many fact-intensive factors for 4 evaluating allegedly impermissible pay deductions from salaried 5 employees
• remanding for district court to consider circumstances surround ing twelve suspensions and noting Secretary’s position that “actual practice” is usually a factual inquiry that is “best left to the trial court”
• finding summary judgment was properly granted where “the appellants ha[d] shown only that [impermissible] deductions were permitted, not that they would in fact be made in specified circumstances”
• “the window of correction is not available if an employer ... has a policy that effectively communicates to its employees that [impermissible] deductions will be made”
• noting the absence of a “bright-line test”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).